Effects of improved street lighting on crime

Additional Info

  • Authors: Brandon Welsh, David Farrington
  • Published date: 2008-09-25
  • Coordinating group(s): Crime and Justice
  • Type of document: Protocol, Review, User abstract
  • Volume: 4
  • Issue nr: 13
  • Category Image: Category Image
  • Title: Effects of improved street lighting on crime
Download files:
Background

Improved street lighting is intended to serve many purposes, one of them being the prevention of crime. While street lighting improvements may not often be implemented with the expressed aim of preventing crime – pedestrian safety and traffic safety may be viewed as more important aims – and the notion of lighting streets to deter lurking criminals may be too simplistic, its relevance to the prevention of crime has been suggested in urban centers, residential areas, and other places frequented by criminals and potential victims.

Objectives

The main objective of this review is to assess the available research evidence on the effects of improved street lighting on crime in public space. In addition to assessing the overall impact of improved street lighting on crime, this review will also investigate in which settings, against which crimes, and under what conditions it is most effective.

Search strategy

Four search strategies were employed to identify studies meeting the criteria for inclusion in this review: (1) searches of electronic bibliographic databases; (2) searches of literature reviews on the effectiveness of improved street lighting in preventing crime; (3) searches of bibliographies of street lighting studies; and (4) contacts with leading researchers. Both published and unpublished reports were considered in the searches. Searches were international in scope and were not limited to the English language.

Selection criteria

Studies that investigated the effects of improved street lighting on crime were included. For studies involving one or more other interventions, only those studies in which improved street lighting was the main intervention were included. Studies were included if they had, at a minimum, an evaluation design that involved before-and-after measures of crime in experimental and control areas. There needed to be at least one experimental area and one reasonably comparable control area.

Data collection & analysis

Narrative findings are reported for the 13 studies included in this review. A meta-analysis of all 13 of these studies was carried out. The “relative effect size” or RES (which can be interpreted as an incident rate ration) was used to measure effect size. Results are reported for total crime and, where possible, property and violent crime categories using (mostly) official data. In the case of studies that measure the impact of improved street lighting programs on crime at multiple points in time, similar time periods before and after are compared (as far as possible). The review also addresses displacement of crime and diffusion of crime prevention benefits.

Main results

The studies included in this systematic review indicate that improved street lighting significantly reduces crime, is more effective in reducing crime in the United Kingdom than in the United States, and that nighttime crimes do not decrease more than daytime crimes.

Reviewers’ conclusions

We conclude that improved street lighting should continue to be used to prevent crime in public areas. It has few negative effects and clear benefits for law-abiding citizens.